Weblog
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
-
My First Love Story aka: The Meaning of Life
"Albert Camus once wrote, "Blessed are the hearts that can bend. They shall never be broken. But I wonder, if there is no breaking, then there is no healing. And if there is no healing, then there is no learning. And if there is no learning, then there is no struggle. But struggle is a part of life, so must all hearts be broken." -Lucas Scott (OTH s5e11, ending monologue)
I would say that my heart has been really broken four times. Those four times only include times when I loved and lost, and none of the times in which I merely longed for and never had. Of those four times, only one is because a romantic relationship ended. And however traumatic that was, it was the lightest heartbreak of the four. If you know anything from my blog that I’ve hinted about my breakup, you can only imagine what the other three worse ones must be like.
But Lucas is right about learning. I learned what I believe is the meaning of my life. Perhaps, by sharing it, you may find some additional meaning in yours.
To love. To be loved. To love and be loved.
TO LOVE
When I was 6 years old, I met another young boy who transferred to my elementary school. He was a troubled kid. Angry. Hateful. He used cuss words some of us had never heard before. He yelled at everybody, including the teachers and principal. By contrast, I was truly blessed. I had awesome friends. I was in the most popular group of boys and our fathers were all friends. I played every peewee sport available in league. I was at least two grades advanced in math and reading. Life was as perfect as one can imagine.
In my naïveté, I could not understand how someone else could be so angry. So hateful. Why did he return my casual smile with swearing and scorn? Why did he ball his fists and throw tantrums? Why did he storm out of class regularly?
But I only knew one thing. I knew how to love. So I smiled at him every day when I saw him. I would say hello clearly and politely. My friends didn’t understand. But they would never go against me, so they merely steered clear. They politely ignored him. For weeks he would swear and yell at me in response. For weeks more he would just yell something. Weeks after that he would give me a cold glare in silence. Weeks after that he would give me a curt nod. Weeks after that he might actually give me a “hey”. And eventually, we became friends.
I found out that he lived with extended relatives. His story was tragic and traumatic. His mother shot herself in a gun cleaning “accident”, but who really knows. His father was either in prison or another because of drugs. I think even in his current home his relatives sold drugs out of the living room. So he was an angry kid. It didn’t go away. At least not for years. But him and I: we were okay. I defended him in more than one fight. I was blessed in a way I cannot explain. Nobody would stand against me, and I used that to stand up for him.
By the time senior year of high school came around, we had really drifted apart. I graduated salutatorian of my high school and went to my choice college. He graduated high school and went to a local community college. And I am so proud of him. Far more proud of him, than I think anyone should be of me.
TO BE LOVED
But there’s more to the story than just that. My friends, while they wouldn’t stand against me, couldn’t understand, and therefore couldn’t stand beside me either. They’re all good people, but they just couldn’t. Except one. T1.
If you know my blog, T1 is my childhood sweetheart. My best friend in elementary school. The girl next door (well, across the street). I don’t think she understood either. But she did know one thing. She knew how to love. She loved me.
She expressed that love by standing beside me when my other friends stood off to the side. She stood beside me even when she was scared of him. When he ran out of the classroom, it would be one hand that shot up to ask if I could go after him. But it was always two that walked out of the room to bring him back. It was always two who sat with him until he calmed down.
I didn’t know it then, but she loved me. She knew that this was important to me. In fact, it was her love for me was what allowed me to love him. People have looked at me and have said that I am strong. But it has always been because stronger people have loved me. All I’ve ever done is try and pass a little of it on to someone else who may have forgotten it. I will never forget her love.
TO LOVE AND BE LOVED
It’s been 20 years since I met T1. But 20 years ago I didn’t understand that I loved her too. I remember now, what I felt then. Now I understand it. I figured it out a long time ago that I loved her. But by the time I expressed that love, it was too late. You see, she never told me, but her home life wasn’t that great. Her parents fought a lot. I could hear them from across the street sometimes. Eventually her father left. She would never trust a man ever again.
I told her I loved her. I must have told her that hundreds of times since the first time. She used to smile, and tell me that I didn’t really love her. Sometimes she’d get angry and tell me that I didn’t even know what love was. For all those years, I kept telling her that I loved her. For all those years we never dated and I thought it was because she didn’t love me. I wrote her poetry. Sang her songs. Gave her flowers on her birthday. She gave me balloons on mine (because I like balloons).
She dated other guys over the years. Eventually we went off to different colleges. I had finally started to move on. I was with my ex at the time. Once she went away to college, she crashed hard. She crashed in every way you can imagine. But eventually she pulled through. Kinda. I wept for her. I went to see her from time to time, when I was back in California. I would admire her beautiful art, or listen to her exquisite music (cello). I would remind her that I loved her. She would scoff at me and tell me I didn’t know what love was. She would introduce me to her current boyfriend. I knew she didn’t love them. But more importantly, we both knew they didn’t love her. She wouldn’t let any man love her. Not after her dad left.
We haven’t spoken in a few years now. She lived in Berkeley the last time I talked to her. Sometimes I drive past her street and have the urge to turn down it and follow my memory to what used to be her front door to see if she’s still there. I was talking to T one day (T = T3 = my best friend). I don’t know why, but I asked why T1 didn’t love me. You see, they were best friends for a long time. T paused. Then she responded, “what are you talking about; how could she NOT love you?” All those years, it wasn’t because she didn’t love me. It was because she couldn’t accept that I loved her. I didn’t fail to win her love. I failed to prove mine.
To love. To be loved. To love and be loved.
This is the meaning of my life. In different times in my life I’ve had one, two, or all three of these. I’ve also had times when I felt like I didn’t have any of them. But it was in those times, that I realized something: I only had power over one of them.
The only part of that I could choose, was the first part. To love. To love even when I am not loved. Maybe especially then. To love without expectation. To love without regret. To love without requirement. To love because of the overwhelming love that has been lavished upon me over the years. To love, because it is the only thing I know how to do. Because it is the only thing that I can choose. When my relationships wash away, and the world ceases to love me, there is but one thing left to do. To choose to love. Not because it’s the better choice. Because it’s the only choice.
I started this blog in the aftermath of my failed relationship. I found myself wandering in the darkness for too long, and there were no answers there. So this is my charge to each of you. There will likely be times in each of our lives where we lose sight of everything. When the darkness, closes in. Many people seek to be loved, or to love and be loved. But truly, you only have control over one thing. To love. And the rest? Well, it’ll find you. In the meantime, live without regret, by loving without requirement, and know that there is meaning in your life, because you loved.
Tuesday, 01 September 2009
-
OA: Why Girls Like Bad Boys
This post is tagged OA, for Observation and Advice.
Before I begin, I want to point out, that there is a much shorter reason (though related) about why Guys like Bad Girls. There is the rarity factor. That plays a small role. A much larger role is the excitement factor. But ultimately, and I think this is no secret, it's the sexual liberation factor. I think by inherent definition, a "Bad Girl" is sexual liberated. This doesn't mean promiscuous, or slutty, or skanky, or anything else. Really, it just means uninhibited. It also might suggest that she has a sex drive equal to that of most men, or more, perhaps. She might be willing to display her body or change it (tattoos, piercings). But ultimately, I think it's the fact that a "Bad Girl" isn't ashamed of her body, her sexual desires (and actions), or of what she wants from others. A friend gave me a book when she moved back to her parents home called "The Good Girl's Guide to Bad Girl Sex". Apparently keeping that on her bookshelf under her parent's roof was, how-you-say, not wise. So it was donated to me (through feat of, 'you're helping me move, but I'm not bringing this into my parents house, so in your car it stays, now it's yours'), and intrigued, I thumbed through it. To be honest, in summary I find it to be a most excellent book. It is a pleasant read, contains tasteful stick figure illustrations (if I recall), isn't overly long, and has some truly excellent suggestions. Wouldn't make a bad gift at all for a recently married 'good girl', or a long-time married in-a-slump couple. Either way, the point was that a "Bad Girl" knows what she wants and isn't ashamed to get it. I think this attitude appeals to guys, not to mention, they can 'get them some'. So, that being said, the reverse is a lot more complicated.
There are many articles about "nice guys" and how we (I place myself in this category) often struggle in relationships, particularly during our younger years. For another read, here is one that was featured on datingish back in February, entitled, Why Girls Go After Jerks. In summary, he identified two reasons why girls are attracted to jerks in the first place: 1. People desire things limited in availability (ie: he doesn't really pay attention to her) and 2. Something earned is more valuable than something given (ie: earning good behavior, or more specifically, they want to 'change' him, thus earning a nice guy from a jerk). He also identified two reasons why girls stay with jerks, even though they continue to be jerks: 1. He treats her better than he treats everyone else (ie: she's special) and 2. Once a person gets exactly what they want, the desire to have it is less than the desire to want it (ie: since a jerk doesn't change, the desire for them to change never diminishes).
This is definitely a good concise argument, and I agree with it. In fact, for some girls chasing jerks, this may be the entirety of the reason. Still though, there are other reasons. Before I go into the other reasons though, I have to recommend an excellent writer, Brick, who has just posted a good memory on this subject as well, entitled The Bad Boy Fascination. Brick is just retelling a tale with some added insight. If you aren't already familiar with his blog, I suggest you subscribe immediately. Also check out his recent repost of 50 things to make life better.
Let's move on though. When I am talking about Girls being attracted to Bad Boys, I'm not JUST talking about jerks, although they're one type of Bad Boy. There are actually "Bad Boys" who are actually totally awesome to their girlfriends (much like mentioned above). So in addition to the idea that girls like to 'change' guys so they can 'earn' a nice guy (in other words, that a bad boy taps into the mothering instinct), I want to propose something very simple: nice guys are boring.
Nice Guys Are Boring.
Doh! While I don't usually like to make such wild blanket stereotypes, this one is valid for the purpose of this argument because the PERCEPTION of nice guys as boring has as much an impact as if it were as factual as me having black hair due to me being Chinese (ie: 99.99% true, alternatively, albino or completely hairless, and I've never bet an albino asian). Therefore, even though not ALL nice guys are as boring as watching paint dry, grass grow, or reading any blog but mine, the fact that they are perceived that way is enough to discourage most girls. In actuality, I'd even argue that most nice guys do tip the scales pretty heavily in the direction of boring, but there are enough of us who are not.
But do I really need to explain why "Bad Boys" are exciting and "Nice Guys" are not? Don't you already know? Surely you must. Rather than waste time explaining that, I want to talk about how to break that.
So for those of us nice guys who believe we might be a good match for a girl who isn't interested, we must break this idea that we, like the Urkels, Carltons, and Rosses of sitcoms, are boring. Instead we must establish ourselves as the Stephan Ur-Kels, Lucas Scotts, or even the Peter Parker turned Spidermans of the world. It is indeed possible to be both, but all too often we find that it is merely EASIER to be nice, boring, and unthreatening.
Un-threatening. The ultimate friend-zoner. I believe nice guys need to transcend the idea that they must be passive and get girls to let their guards down by pretending that their balls don't produce a sex drive like every other guy on the planet. We should be as capable of being as forward as the Bad Boy, though slightly differently. Being forward doesn't mean sidling up to a girl in a bar and asking her to come home with you. Being forward as a nice guy means letting a girl know you're attracted to her. It means asking for her number, or, assuming you already have it, because she's disarmed by your reputation, asking her out on a date. And you know what nice guys? Call it a date. Be a man and ask her "would you like to go out... on a date... with me?" If you go with the less aggressive version of "let's hang out at the mall", you'll get friend zoned so fast you'll be wearing a pink shirt and following her around carrying Victoria's secret bags to impress that Bad Boy before you can say "Screw me" (both literally and figuratively). Case in point, I absolutely refuse to wear pink because, no offense to guys who like that, I already have enough trouble distinguishing myself from the gay friend as it is.
So in truth, the problem is NOT that Girls like Bad Boys. We can't really change that, and frankly, pointing it out is useless, because they will STILL like Bad Boys. Instead, we need to change ourselves so that they like us TOO. That is the key. Some people are so opposed to change, because it's not "who I am". I call bull. I'm not suggesting a Nice Guy act like a Jerk, or take the lessons from some MTV show. I am suggesting that you adapt, man up, and be forward with your desires. Just like the Bad Girl is sexually liberated, us Nice Guys need to be socially liberated. No longer are we confined to being shopping partners and 'hang out buddies'. By day we can be Peter Parker, mild mannered nice guy. By night, we are dates, interesting, complex, sophisticated... exciting. I can write poetry and give hugs. But I can also stand up for myself and my girl, scale a rock wall, drive stick and peel out, talk loudly enough to get someone's attention, ski, snowboard, throw a baseball, shoot a basket, fire a gun, swing a sword, and be as much of a man as any Bad Boy out there.
Changing from a nice guy to a jerk because some MTV show suggests that's a way to get laid is a copout. Instead, take everything you can from that Bad Boy and add it to your nice guy regime. Ask out the girl you want to go out with. Listen to her problems, but then tell her about the time you almost fell off a cliff. Open the door for her, but defend her against the guy who makes a lewd comment about her. Hug her, but don't be afraid to kiss her (if appropriate, don't take advantage of a crying girl, that's just... shady). Surely it is possible to be both, and complaining that girls like jerks is pointless. Yes, they do. That is a fact. The only thing within your power is to be more than what you already are. Sure, maybe the jerk has it slightly easier to get that girl from the bar back to his place before the bar closes and back out before the sun rises, but that doesn't mean you can't find a relationship that you want to have. One that is more than just a shoulder to cry on, or a partner to jump into bed with. I am not content to wait until girls figure out that they want to marry one of us, and not the jerk. I am not content to becoming the jerk. I want to be the exciting nice guy. So who's up for rock climbing over labor day weekend?
Saturday, 22 August 2009
-
QO: Not Single, but Looking
This post is tagged QO, for Question and Observation.
I couldn't think of a catchy title, so that is the best I came up with. Maybe I'll change it later. The point is, how do you all approach and deal with people who are already either:
1. "seeing somebody" aka: dating
2. "in a relationship" aka: has a boyfriend/girlfriend aka: monogamous
3. "serious" aka: long term relationship
4. "engaged" aka: man shelled out lots of money for a ring and woman spends lots of time planning a wedding
5. "married" aka: Shackled
But not only does someone fall into one of the above 5 relationship statuses, there are degrees of happiness, or to make a a word, "right-ness" of that relationship. There are many reasons to be in a relationship, not all of which suggest you should stay in that (particular) relationship.
I am an advocate of the idea that you should NOT "trade up", or attempt to anyway. The reason I say this, is because this is a very slippery slope which often involves regret and often, going back and forth between relationships. HOWEVER, I DO believe, in ending a current relationship, in part (even in large part) because you met someone new, or knew someone old better. These are not the same. Basically, sometimes you meet someone and the result is that you are no longer satisfied with your current relationship because:
1. You realize that you want something that you don't currently have
2. You realize that you can be treated and like to be treated a way you aren't currently
3. You realize that there is a different match (not necessarily 'better') that you prefer
4. The new feelings are so overwhelming and superior that you realize your current ones are inadequate
The reason this is different from "trading up" is that if one or more of those above things are truly true, you could end your current relationship, even if there is no potential with the new one... IF you can overcome some of the less 'substantial' reasons for being in your current relationship. Some of the "less substantial" reasons for being in a relationship are:
1. Loneliness: some people cannot be alone, so feel they are compelled to be in a relationship, even if it's a bad one
2. Personal Needs: monetary, culinary, cleanliness, normalcy. Some needs are more shallow and selfish (like, need someone to do your laundry), while others can actually be deeper and/or more difficult to break away from (like monetary, or, they help keep you away from drug, alcohol, gambling, or other addictions).
3. Difficulty Breaking Up: Common, sadly. I once had a buddy tell me that he was still with his gf because it was easier to continue in the relationship than go through the effort of breaking up. I was not pleased with him, but that's another long story. The reverse is also true, where one party does want to break up, but the other keeps holding on.
4. Comfort: being together is so comfortable, it seems like a lot of effort and discomfort to NOT be with them
5. Self-blackmail: Ever heard someone say, "we've been together so long and he knows so much about me (flaws) and he still 'loves' me, nobody else could feel the same"?
6. Merged Identity: in ultra long term close couples, they can form a merged identity where one or both feels 'lost' without the other.
There are more reasons, some more shallow, some deeper, but these are a few. The point is, just because two people are in one of the 5 types of relationships, doesn't necessarily mean they should be. Sometimes a catalyst for them breaking up (in the form of a friend, family member, new acquaintance, or even new potential mate) can be a legitimate (and potentially positive) thing.
Nobody can guarantee that you'll suddenly be 'happier' in the aftermath of a breakup, especially if you go from relationship to single, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't break up. Having an idea of what the RIGHT relationship looks like just makes it easier to make that leap. If you do jump into that "right" relationship or if you just jump to being single, you shouldn't ever feel the desire to 'go back', because the REASONS you ended your old relationship, shouldn't change. At least, not in the immediate aftermath. Maybe 10 years down the road you might change your mind, but who knows what we want 10 years from now.
Girls in relationships that I think should end is a common theme that I deal with. Most of the time I stand on the sidelines as either an outside observer, or as a close friend. Basically it means that I think the relationship should end with no particular ulterior motives. However, I have also been in the situation where I believed it should end (legitimately, as if I had no ulterior motives) but I ALSO had personal reasons involved (ie: I wanted to date her). Does the existence of ulterior motives give me bias? Perhaps. I'd like to think I'm mostly immune to bias, but it would be folly to think that it doesn't effect me at all.
Because I've dealt with decidedly un-single girls who SHOULD be single, both ones I'm interested in, but more importantly, ones I'm not, over time I have developed no particular qualms with making subtle or overt attempts at ending someone else's (bad) relationship, for her gain, and sometimes my own. However, I have rules:
1. I must expect that she (or perhaps he) is better off single, than in said relationship.
2. I must expect that there is a better relationship out there for them (this is NOT the same as #1: there is the possibility that someone is 'better off' single, but doesn't WANT to be single, ie: wants kids, and that they'll never find someone better, therefore, stick with what they have, rare, but possible)
3. I must have some significant personal relationship with one or both parties (ie: I know one or both well enough to be able to determine that #1 and #2 are true)
4. I understand that my actions may harm or destroy their relationship with each other, and/or my relationship with them (that's 3 relationships at risk, and only one of them intentionally put at risk)
5. Anything I say or do will ultimately result in either their relationship improving (ie: fix it) or leading them to break up (because it didn't fix).
All of those rules are important, but really it is the last one that requires explanation. I would not directly say to someone "he's a jerk, you should break up with him". Why? Because it's almost like an ultimatum. I have placed a negative label from me on him that I can't remove. The solution is either, break up with him as suggested, or disappoint me. Instead I might say, "it's really irresponsible of him to keep you up all night worrying because he was out drinking with his buddies and he was supposed to call when he got home safely, and didn't. You don't deserve that." Basically, I give him (and myself) a way 'out'. I never have to 'take back' my words, if they stay together. The statement will stand for all time. Even if he eventually shapes up and matures, the statement will always stand, because it's a fact. What he did was irresponsible, and she deserves better. If he changes, then the statement is still true, but it no longer applies to him. Good for both of them. Sadly, this rarely happens, and instead, those statements stack up, and eventually the relationship will end on her own terms. In this way, I never personally attack him, only his actions, and I run far fewer risks of alienating my friend.
So in the end, if it surprises anyone that I would hit on, express interest in, or otherwise engage someone who is already in a relationship, ultimately it's because I think they shouldn't be in it. Either they should be with me, or they should just be single.
But one last rule. I will not break up a marriage except in the most abusive of circumstances (I don't know many married people in my generation, so this is not an issue). If there are children involved, it's even more complicated (balance having an 'unstable' two parent home, versus, an unknown single parent home and a broken household, which is worse, you know?).
No wait, one more rule. I will not UNDERMINE a relationship because I am interested. This means I will not 'court' a girl who is not available. I may express interest. I may point out flaws in her current relationship. I might even ask her to leave him for me. But I will not try to 'win her' by undermining her relationship or by romantically courting her. That's the kind of stuff that gets you beat down in an alley by guys with baseball bats, and to be honest, I'd rather be the one wielding the bat than getting hit by it (not literally, but you know what I mean).
So here's the question. Do you agree with my 'rules' about breaking up a relationship? Do you think it is wrong for me to express interest or ask a girl to end her relationship to be with me? Have you ever dealt with this?
Friday, 21 August 2009
-
A: Thoughts Drive Feelings
This post is tagged A, for Advice.
Since my hobby is amateur psychology, over the years I have picked up small tidbits of theories from different schools of thought. Since I am too lazy to study, I rarely get much detail into any particular concept, but usually I read just enough to believe that I understand the concept on my own. In a colloquial sense, I am content understanding that gravity is some force that pulls objects towards the center of a large massive body (ie: center of the earth). The details behind it, such as the gravitational constant big G, the inverse square distance relationship of the two bodies, and how the masses of the two objects effect the strength of the force between them are largely irrelevant to me.
So when I learned about Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), I was intrigued enough to want to learn the general concept of it, and I think I have. There are several different types of therapy. Best I know, the major players are:
General Private Therapy (aka: shrink) - talking out certain problems, either with a friend, social worker, trained therapist, MFT (Masters In Family Therapy), or PhD in Psychology
General Group Therapy - Same as above, except as a group, usually people with similar experiences
Drug Therapy - Through a Psychiatrist, usually in conjunction with intake involving a Psychologist, but not mandatory. I believe most Psychiatrists do an independent evaluation before prescribing medication, whether this is a single session or a series of them, I do not know.
And finally, CBT, or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. I'm sure there are many ways to break down the above categories, but I like to lump down all the different techniques and styles into those three, and then CBT is separate. The theory behind CBT is simple:
Thoughts Drive Feelings.
Make sense? Think about it for a little bit. As simple (or stupid) as that sounds, it is actually amazingly profound of a statement. When you think about something sad, you feel sad. When you think about something happy, you feel happy. This should be apparent. The concept behind CBT is that if we focus our energy on positive thoughts, and learn to gear our minds around those, we can improve our mood. The actual techniques are more developed than someone telling you to be more optimistic, naturally, but I'll just give a few examples. One thing most everyone does, is what are called "cognitive distortions". Basically, twisted ways of thinking, that damage us emotionally. These distortions can turn small things into major obstacles, and cause minor negative emotions to become enormous. While it's useful to have a therapist pointing these cognitive distortions out while you talk (to make you aware of exactly how skewed your thinking is), self-analysis is possible, especially in the context of a blog, where you can see what you just wrote.
The following is a summary of page 8 and 9 of "The Feeling Good Handbook" by David D. Burns, M.D.
Ten Forms of Twisted Thinking (or Cognitive Distortions)
1. All or Nothing Thinking - In simple terms, this means you tend to see the world, successes, and most importantly, failures, as black and white. The example in the book is the person on a diet eating a spoonful of ice cream thinking to herself "I've blown my diet completely!" The same mentality might happen if you miss a workout day, or take a nap instead of studying. Your thoughts don't really change the facts, you may have done something that wasn't part of the 'plan', but when you think in all-or-nothing terms, your mood is heavily damaged by small slips.
2. Overgeneralization - Use of always and never in negative terms. This one is dangerous, because we tend to do it SO OFTEN. Last year, my brother, my roommate, my parents, my college roommate who I talk to like once a year, and the dealership I bought my car from remembered to call me on my birthday (the latter because it was a machine). They were the only birthday wishes I got on my birthday. T, A, H&H, S, all forgot. Not only did they forget, they didn't remember until they were subtly reminded weeks later when they noticed either the very nice watch my brother gave me or the humongous framed poster from The Dark Knight my roommate gave me, commented on it, to which I responded politely that I got it for my birthday (I don't acquire new things often, so this explanation was not vindictive, it was natural). At which point they apologized profusely for forgetting my birthday. Anyway, story aside, overgeneralization is the thought I had. I told my shrink "Nobody remembered my birthday" and I felt terrible when I said it, because it was followed by the thought, "Nobody cared". How awful is it to feel, even for a moment, that NOBODY cared? It also was terribly untrue. My family, my roommate, and my old roommate DID remember my birthday. The truth was, several people forgot my birthday, and yes, that hurt. But it's a far cry from the loneliness of NOBODY caring. Overgeneralization takes a bad feeling, and makes it a whole lot worse.
3. Mental Filter - This is better known as obsessing over one negative detail (similar to all or nothing). Basically, you may get lots of positive comments about your weight, or appearance, or debate skills, or a project that you worked on, but instead you dwell over the one negative thing that someone said. This is the cognitive distortion that cripples people who can't take criticism.
4. Discounting the Positive - H&H do this ALL THE TIME. In fact, I think it's their #1 cognitive distortion, and potentially the worst of them all. Know anybody who can't take a compliment? "You look really nice today!" "Oh, thanks, but my hair's all a mess, and I have a pimple coming in. I'm such a wreck." We all know someone, or ARE the someone who does this. Where did that compliment go in your mind? It doesn't exist anymore, because we discounted it. In fact, that compliment might even be replaced by the things YOU said, and even though you may not consciously attribute YOUR words to THEM, subconciously, you might. You saw them as seeing yourself the way you saw yourself negatively. Don't discount the positive.
5. Jumping To Conclusions/Mind Reading/Fortune Telling - Again, this is assuming negative conclusions. Someone looks at you and frowns, and you "read their mind" and start thinking that you know WHY they frowned, and, naturally, it was all your fault. Of course, they might not have been looking at you at all and thinking about the fly they accidentally ate during lunch. Fortune telling is simply playing out a possibility to disasterous consequences unnecessarily, "I'm going to fail this quiz, which means I'm going to flunk out of this class, I'll end up dropping out of college, never find a good job, never find a significant other because I'll be a bum, end up homeless, addicted to drugs and alcohol, and die somewhere in a gutter." We may do this to a limited extent, but when you realize that you've just turned studying for a quiz into overcoming poverty, drug addiction, and death, what was a simple task and a small obstacle, becomes INSURMOUNTABLE. This is a common self-sustaining feature of depression. When a small task such as, say, getting out of bed in the morning cascades into, my life is going nowhere, you find yourself unable to perform even the simplest of tasks, because the obstacle you conclude with, is too vast to overcome, so why bother getting out of bed? If you deal with this, you need to learn to take some things in a microcosm and focus on one step at a time. Big picture is nice, sure, but not when that big picture cripples you from step one: getting out of bed in the morning.
6. Magnification - I think I overlapped this one with the above description, but they're somewhat similar. Magnifying a small obstacle into a large one. I don't have any good examples of this, but it is definitely a cognitive distortion. Exaggeration (even in your mind) damages your psyche. Even if you just jokingly say "man, my room is so messy, it's going to take a thousand years to clean it all up", you've actually magnified the obstacle in such a way, you turn yourself off from wanting to overcome it. On some levels you KNOW it won't actually take a thousand years, but that thought, that statement affects your mood. I guess I did have an example. Good for me.
7. Emotional reasoning - I can't say I have much experience with this, because I am a decisively unemotional person. In fact, I do the reverse, I use my reasoning to create emotions. But basically, the way the book describes it is, "I'm scared of flying" therefore "it must be dangerous to fly". I suppose this might fall into the category of when your instincts create obstacles for you. Sometimes instincts are good, but when they start going awry, it can really control your behavior.
8. "Should statements" - This is another thing I personally don't do too often, so I don't have as much experience with it. This is pretty common among others though. "I should have done better." "I shouldn't have made so many mistakes." "I should have seen that coming." Those statements lead to guilt, and perhaps frustration. These statements can also be directed externally. "He shouldn't have said that." "He should have been watching out more carefully." "He should call me." These lead to anger and frustration.
9. Labeling - Dr. Burns points out that this is an extreme form of all-or-nothing thinking, and he's right. This is one of the more dangerous, but also easier to fix, cognitive distortions. Where all-or-nothing thinking may have led from eating one spoon of ice cream to "I've blown my diet completely", the result of labeling is that you may then think "Gosh, I have no self-control" and ultimately "I'm such a loser". Where one spoon of ice cream is a minor issue, how does one overcome "I'm such a loser"? Your mind has created an insurmountable obstacle, one that has no clear path to overcoming. H had the cognitive distortion, due to some scarring on her legs, that "that scar is so ugly. I'm so ugly. It'll never go away. I'll always be ugly. Nobody will ever be able to love me." Believe it or not, that progression of thought, while extreme, is not uncommon. It's also extremely dangerous, especially if you're already prone to depression. Labeling also applies to others. It is an extreme form of stereotyping, and can make socializing very difficult.
10. Personalization - I have discussed this cognitive distortion before when I wrote "Girls Please Stop Lying" several months back. Personalization takes on many forms. H&H and T actually all do this. In the simple way, if they plan a group event, like, meeting for dinner, and something goes wrong, they blame themselves. They take personal responsibility if someone else is late, or the restaurant misbooks the reservation, or even if someone's order comes out wrong. Anything that goes wrong, they personalize it and feel like it's their fault. This also leads into a discussion from another book that I'll save for another time. In a more extreme form, Dr. Burns uses the example of a child getting bad grades or getting into a fight at school, resulting in her saying to herself "I must be a bad mother." Taking responsibility and attempting to improve something is different from personalization. Here, personalization and labeling combine to redefine and destroy her entire self-image. How does one fix "being a bad mother"? In my writing, the example I used was, "if he abuses me, it must be my fault. I made him angry. I let him down. Perhaps if I were different, he wouldn't hit me." Dr. Burns also uses this example. A last example I'll point out, is a very common one among young children of divorced parents. They blame the divorce on themselves. Perhaps if they loved their parents more, they'd stay together. Perhaps if they weren't so difficult to raise. Perhaps if they didn't cost so much money.
Those are the 10 cognitive distortions listed in Dr. Burns' book. I don't know if he coined those exact names or that list, but all of them can negatively affect our lives. I myself succumb to at least 5 or 6 of them, and even being aware of it, I often have to stop and re-think things I've just said to myself to attempt to adjust my thinking, and ultimately, my mood. Here are some tricks to deal with each one (just a few things, buy the book for more workshops and another 700 pages on using CBT methods to improve your mood and your life, though, to be honest, page 9 is about as far as I got...):
Overcoming Cognitive Distortions
1. Overcoming All-Or-Nothing Thinking - If you find yourself thinking of things in black and white terms, perfect success or complete failure, back up a bit and realize that plans don't have to be perfect. You can reach a goal without executing the steps flawlessly. Even when we stumble, we can still aim for the same goal, and when we reach it, it doesn't matter how many mistakes we made, the success is still success. Very few things in life are a complete disaster when one minor thing goes wrong (notable exceptions: Space Exploration and Rocket Science).
2. Overcoming overgeneralization - I struggle with this one a lot, and my shrink continually corrects my statements because of it. I might say "I'm so disappointed, I never stick to my plans." She'll respond, "no, sometimes you don't stick to your plans." Sometimes she'll completely contradict me and say, "no, usually you stick to your plans." I now try to correct myself in my thinking as well. When I catch myself using always or never, I try to stop, think about it, and change the thought and reword it so that it's more accurate. Instead of "I have no friends" or "all my friends left me" I think "I have a few friends" or even "T never left me for a moment". Think about how much more positive that sounds!
3. Overcoming your Mental Filter - Criticism can be hard to take, I struggle with it. What you don't want, is to allow that criticism to wash away everything else. What you want to do is to take criticisms in stride of the good as well. Remind yourself that the good aspects are important as well, and that you'll work to improve the weaknesses until that is as good as the rest. Don't think of it as, "this one thing is very weak". Instead think of it as, "I want this to be as good as everything else is."
4. Overcoming Discounting the Positive - Can't take a compliment? Start taking them. When someone gives you a compliment, just be silent. In fact, pause, repeat their words in your head a few times, until you believe what they said. If you still want to admonish some other aspect about yourself, because you absolutely have to, then fine. I'd rather you not, because self-admonishing is no fun, but at least you heard and accepted the compliment. One step at a time, right?
5. Overcoming Jumping to Conclusions - Okay, this one is difficult. Just try not to over-analyze. Perhaps an easier suggestion is to jump to both positive and negative conclusions. If everything is fire and brimstone, the world is a pretty dark place. Let your mind dwell on marshmellows and cotton candy as well.
6. Overcoming Magnification - Um, don't do it? Try not to exaggerate, even in your own thoughts, especially when it comes to dealing with obstacles. It's a lot harder to tackle a problem when you need to lose "a million pounds" or complete "a thousand hours" of homework.
7. Overcoming Emotional Reasoning - Again, I'm a bit weak in this area, because I'm not really capable of doing this. It's difficult to prevent, but if you can recognize when your emotions are making you irrational, then you might be able to start overcoming that. Since emotions can often wipe away reason, it might require an outside perspective to overcome.
8. Overcoming "Should" Statements - These will kick us all until the end of time. Shoulda Woulda Coulda. The only way I can suggest to overcoming this particular cognitive distortion, is to focus on things that you can change in the future. I know this doesn't help THAT much, but it can help distract you. They say hindsight is 20/20 (which it really isn't, because often we distort our hindsight, but anyway), so if you couldn't possible have seen it coming, why feel extra guilty for not having done something differently? If you COULD have seen it coming, and maybe in the future you can avoid the same situation, then focus on what you want to adjust for next time. That's all I have to say about that...
9. Overcoming Labeling - Don't do it. Really, don't. One major problem with depression is labeling. When you label yourself, you stamp an obstacle on your forehead that can't be overcome. How does one take steps to "stop being a loser" or to "stop being unsuccessful"? Those labels resulted from a cascade of all-or-nothing thinking, magnification, and practically every other cognitive distortion. Some people use labels to drive themselves until they can change that label (ie: overweight). However, labels can often cripple us, because they can be so difficult to remove once we've stamped them on. Instead focus on what you want to be. Then focus on the first step you need to take, in order to move in that DIRECTION. You don't take one step in order to becoming successful. You take one step in that direction. Step one is getting out of bed.
10. Overcoming Personalization and Self-Blame - This one is terrible to overcome. In the case of H&H, this stems from years and years of their mother blaming everything, EVERYTHING, on them. It didn't matter the circumstances or who was at fault. Everything that went wrong was their fault. There is actually another book that talks about this, and uses a pretty nifty diagram to do it. I don't know the book name, but the concept is called knowing your "Zone of Control" and your "Zone of Influence". Draw a small circle, and label it your Zone of Control. Anything that you can actually control (usually this basically means control over YOURSELF only, and some LIMITED events that we have control over). Around that small circle, draw a much larger circle and call it your Zone of Influence. We can influence a lot of things in our lives. Everything not in those two circles, are completely out of our power. Then what you need to realize, is that no matter how large your zone of influence is, you can only take personal responsibility for things inside of your Zone of CONTROL. When we have some influence over something, if it goes awry, we can't take full responsibility, because we didn't have control. We only had influence. You might be able to take responsibility if a specific part of where you had control went wrong, but a lot of the time, the things we feel guilty about are so far outside of our zone of control, or even our zone of influence (like the waiter screwing up someone's order), that it doesn't make sense that we feel guilty about it. Don't personalize what is so far beyond your zone of control, because the world becomes a very stressful place.
I believe that Cognitive Behavioral Therapy really works. When we change our thoughts, it can help us turn distorted insurmountable obstacles ("I am a loser") into things we can overcome ("I will look in the classified ads today, after I get out of bed"). Changing our thoughts can also improve our mood ("Nobody loves me" becomes "my family and T love me"). We can't change how we think overnight, but we can recognize some of our worst cognitive distortions and try to change them slowly over time. I pride myself on precise and logical thinking, but even I succumb to these things regularly, and try to change them. Sometimes it is with the help of an expensive PhD shrink, and sometimes it is laying in bed falling asleep. In the end, every little bit helps.
Which of these do you do most often? Do you think recognizing it as a distortion will help you overcome it?
P.S. If you're interested in the Feeling Good Handbook, it is an interactive book where you can write down and perform self-evaluation exercises meant to practice the methods talked about. I have both the book and the handbook, but I (and my shrink) think the only one you need is the handbook. It's more interactive and better for the layperson and discusses the same things that the book does. ISBN-10: 0452281326
Thursday, 20 August 2009
-
OP: On Friends
This entry is tagged OP, for Observation, followed by some Personal.
I’ve been doing a lot of thinking lately. I’ve been traveling and moving, keeping me away from my computer, so it has meant that instead of thinking and putting it down on paper, I’ve been keeping it all in my head. This is unfortunate, I’d say, for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, because there is a limited amount of thoughts I can hold concurrently in my head, and over time I tend to lose some of them. I don’t mean I forget about them, what I mean is that I can only think about so many things simultaneously all at once. They just get displaced for awhile until something reminds me again. Secondly, I do feel that somewhat, as I write, it relieves some pressure on me to keep things in my head. Once I ‘put it out there’, I feel less uneasy when thoughts get pushed to memory. In the event that I get struck by a train today, the thought however important or mundane, exists. Third, it means my blog doesn’t get any traffic, which means I am depriving my readers of my endless wit and insight *cough*. Anyway, the point is, somehow, I decided that this particular thought bears special effort to put to print.
I have been asked many times, “what is a friend?” This means different things to everyone, but I have given it considerable thought, and I think it is developed enough to share with all of you. Here’s the short version:
A friend is someone who thinks of you, when you aren’t around.
That’s it. Now naturally there’s a bit of qualification by ‘thinks’. Your enemies also think of you when you’re not around, but that’s not what I mean. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say thinks positively of you. Either they wonder how you are, or they worry about something in your life, or they miss you, or perhaps they are remembering some good times you’ve shared. Perhaps they send out some positive vibes in your direction. But I like that definition, and it is now my standing definition of a friend. At least… that’s my succinct definition. You know me, here comes the long definition:
1. Met once: You met at a party or event, maybe even had a brief conversation with, but never saw/spoke to again. You might recognize them on the street or be able to pull their name out of a hat, but never developed the interaction any further. Maybe you never even got each other’s name, but you know, “yeah, I met her once.”
2. A Name/Face: The lowest level of acquaintance. Ever have someone say, “hey, remember Bob?” Then you respond, “yeah… name sounds familiar…” Or conversely, you say, “hey, remember… remember… you know… what’s his face? With the hair, you know, and the thing, that thing?” *Note* That’s not how I talk, but that’s exactly how J describes people. It’s awful. The worst part is, I can usually guess who he’s talking about within 3 tries. That’s what happens when you were best friends for more than a decade. The following has actually occurred several times:
J: Steve, you remember, uh, you know, *snaps fingers repeatedly*, uh, uh, uh.
Me: No.
J: Yeah, you know…
Me: Person, place, food, thing buddy.
J: Person! You know! Teacher!
Me: Oh, okay… which one…
J: You know! *waves arms and snaps fingers* Uh, uh, uh…
Me: *patient silence*
J: BOOBS
Me: Oh, Ms. Davis.
J: Yeah… Brenda…
Me: *shakes head*
For the record, B Davis was our high school junior year AP English teacher (if any of you have her as a teacher/lover/friend/acquaintance, ask her about the time her students [us] got arrested, she’ll tell you). I didn’t notice at the time, but apparently it would have been more appropriate if her first name was Daisy, or Delilah, or Denise. I didn’t notice, but that’s largely because I was thinking along a different train of thought of names, more like Devil, or Satan, or Lucifer. We had a mutual dislike for one another, but that’s another story entirely. Wait, I digress, back to it. So that’s the second category, A Name/Face. You know, what’s his face?
3. Distant/old acquaintance: So this actually breaches the first major category of people you know. Not quite a friend, but an “acquaintance”. An acquaintance is someone you associate or associated with, but doesn’t quite make the friend category. They could be a classmate, or a co-worker. It would be someone about whom you could say, “yeah, I’m acquainted with him, we worked in the same office. He used to hit on the boss’ wife all the time. I wonder where he works now?” In this case, distant/old either means that you barely know and rarely see this acquaintance ever, or anymore. A distant acquaintance would mean that you probably never really saw much of them, whereas an old acquaintance could mean that you used to, but it’s been years since then, and probably haven’t heard from them since. These are the kinds of people you run into at high school reunions and reminisce about B Davis with.
4. Casual acquaintance: This is basically the same as the previous category, but that they’re still currently in your life. I’d say I was a casual acquaintance of the 3rd floor janitor at my old workplace, Carlos (now he’s a distant/old acquaintance). I knew his name, I saw him every day, I could pick him out of a crowd, we greeted each other, but that’s about it. He didn’t speak much English, and my Spanish is awful, so we never really talked. Super friendly guy though. Still recognized me and waved whenever I went back to visit. A classmate you don’t really know is usually a casual acquaintance. This is also a good category for your sibling’s friends.
5. Close acquaintance/Social acquaintance: Now this might seem like a contradictory category, but based on my definition of a friend, it must exist. A close acquaintance is someone who is not quite a friend (by my definition), but you actually hang out with. Most people would call this person a friend. The best example I have for me, is my buddy TT and KT (brothers). We are only social buddies. On occasion he’ll call me up and see if I want to hit a club or a party with them and a group. We used to hang out pretty often (in fact, we used to be friends), but now he’s just a social acquaintance. It sounds a little awkward, but I use the term because I like to distinguish the fact that if either of us dropped off the face of the planet, the other wouldn’t necessarily notice or care (at least, not care on a personal level, we’d both be like “OH SNAP, he got hit by a train? That blows”). Don’t get me wrong, we look out for each other and last time we hung he was throwing all kinds of girls in my direction (he brought 5 girls, and my other buddy brought 5 girls, and there was only one other single guy in the group), but we’re not REALLY friends. We never talk outside of a social situation, or wish each other happy birthdays, or ask things like “how’s the family?” We’re social buddies, good ones, but just that. Similarly, a close acquaintance might be a close classmate, one who’s always in your project groups, but you’ve never gotten to know them outside of class or school. You didn’t know that he’s actually the son of a billionaire, but has cast off his family money and changed his name in pursuit of earning his own way through life. And that he’s actually a girl. Or used to be. Yeah. Didn’t see that one coming, did you?
6. Distant/old friend: So now we upgrade to the friend category, remembering the definition (thinks about you when you’re not around, remember?). See, for me to call someone my friend is to suggest that they care about me on a personal level. It doesn’t mean that they think about me all the time, or that they miss me when I’m not around. It just means that at least once in awhile they wonder to themselves, “I wonder how Steven’s doing?” Perhaps they’ll even pick up a phone and call to find out, or send a text or an e-mail. Even if this only happens every few years (as in this category), it still matters. My elementary school friends fall into this category. I still know them, as in, I could pick up the phone and get a hold of them, but we talk every few years, and aren’t really close anymore. But you know, I’d still be sad if I heard something happened to them, and I’d like to think that they’d be sad too if they heard I got hit by a train. I mean, that stuff’s just tragic. One moment you’re moseying your way along without a care in the world and the next moment WHAM, locomotive. Wait, I’m distracted again, gotta keep moving.
7. Friend: I don’t actually say “casual friend”, but it’s the equivalent. Your generic friend. Does this really require description? Eh, it’s me, so what the heck. Your typical friend. They know you somewhat. You hang out. You talk outside of mandatory interactions. When something bad happens to you, they feel sad, or, if they can do something about it, they do. At least they’ll try to cheer you up.
8. Close friend: These are not only your friend, but these are your good friends, your close friends. These are the ones that know you pretty well to d@mn well. We know who these are. Might have a handful of these perhaps. I used to anyway. They know things about you that don’t come up in casual conversations. There isn’t really a specific requirement WHAT they know though. One close friend might know that I always like to sit facing the front door/primary entrances and that I scout exits whenever I go out to eat and that I can use chopsticks both left and right handed. Another close friend might know my entire social and/or dating history past, present, and optimistically hopeful future. Still another might know about all of my life, health, family, work problems. These are the people that cry when they hear you got hit by a train. Hopefully not the only ones, but they definitely should. I mean, at least on the inside.
9. Best friend: This would be T.
10. The One: It seemed odd to have only 9 categories when 10 is so much more even. So number ten is your soulmate. Maybe it’s your husband or wife. Maybe it’s your best friend. Or maybe you haven’t met them yet. T isn’t my first best friend (actually she’s the 3rd). J was number 2. T1 was number 1 (FYI: “T” = T3, “the ex” is T2, and my “childhood sweetheart” =T1). I suppose it’s difficult to ever really know when you’ve met “the one”, because unlike for Morpheus and Neo, you can’t just walk into an old apartment and have some old lady tell you who “the one” is. You also can’t wait for them to stop bullets and fly, both of which tend to cause death to you mere mortals. But that’s okay. Whether you know it or not, they still are the one, and to be honest, if you ‘miss’ out on them, then they’re not it. Perhaps they could have been, which is frustrating and is cause for much grey hair, but hopefully eventually you’ll not only find them, but stick to them, and let the good times roll. I think this is also T. I believe that. She’d probably deny it though. I think denying it helps keep her sane. Frankly, if I was her and I knew I was as good as it gets when it comes to “The One”, I’d probably be throwing back all kinds of pharmaceuticals, so I don’t blame her.
And that’s that. See now, you might be wondering to yourself, why is this post so important? Why is this post more important than any of the other pending thoughts I have in my head but have not yet put to paper? That’s because, this is only the public portion of this post. See, while it’s not important how many close friends you have (whether it be 1 or 10), how that number changes over time DOES matter. It’s nice when a close friend gets added to the ranks. And it’s not so nice when one drops out. Let’s look at my numbers by range of years:
# of close friends over time (not including best friend, if any)
Elementary School Years – 6 + many close social acquaintances (Best Friend = T1)
6th Grade – 0 (no best friend, transitional drought)
7th/8th Grade – 0 (Best Friend = J, hung out constantly)
9th-11th Grade – 3ish + several close social acquaintances (Best Friend = J)
12th Grade + 3 years of college – 6 extremely close friends (Best Friend = J, T3 climbing the ranks, dating my ex, who is T2)
Year 4 of college + 2 years beyond – Same as previous 4 years, but lost one close friend.
So if we look at this, I was super popular with lots of close friends and my childhood sweetheart for the 6 years of elementary school. Middle school I was a bit of a loner, but I met J and we became instant best friends and had grand times. High School I started reclaiming my social life, finding new friends, ultimately forming a close-knit group of 8 (including me and J, 4 guys/4 girls) that we kept together for 7 years from high school through college (losing one of the guys along the way). Two I had known since Kindergarten. Three since middle school. Just T was new to me from high school (I mean, I met her in middle school, but we didn’t really know each other at all, err, I take that back, I didn’t know her, I’m sure she knew plenty about me, long story, she and T1 were close).
Seven years of being a group. As close of friends as friends can be. We made plans and hung out every time it was feasible to do so between college and work schedules. We went to Vegas together as a group. We traveled other places too. We road tripped. We had sleepovers and crashed on futons to wake at noon for brunch. We shared hopes and dreams and fears. We celebrated together and cried together (usually the girls in the group doing the crying).
2007 I proposed to my ex, she accepted, a few months later she cheated on me and then kicked my @$$ to the curb for some douchebag guy she’d known for a month. That next year sucked. I went into recovery mode. Failed miserably attempting to land a rebound relationship. That brings us to 2008. If you notice, I created this Xanga at the beginning of 2009. I locked down my old one (which was basically a diary that only my group of 8 really read, it dates back to 2004 before they had all of these nifty networking things like top blogs and pulses and groups and the like). Why did I lock that one and create this one?
I’ll tell you why. Because I got dumped by all of my close friends, J, A, and H&H. The 5th person, S, didn’t dump me, but of the group, we’re the least close, and since he’s out of state, we rarely talk or hang out outside of the group anymore. That just leaves me and T.
Have you ever broken up with a significant other? Know what that’s like? Ever lost a best friend? Try losing a gf turned fiancée of 7 years and 4 best friends of 7 years in the span of a year. It kinda sucks. You know what sucks more? It’s not like we had some kind of big fight and couldn’t resolve it. Yes, a very small fight may have started this cascade, but ultimately, we’re not friends anymore because they decided they didn’t want to be. They up and decided I wasn’t worth being friends with. Same with my ex. We didn’t have some fight that resulted in her cheating and dumping me. She just decided she wanted something different. Ultimately she told me she could never see her being with me ever again (I held her engagement ring for a year since I couldn’t bear parting with something that meant so much to us, well, at least to me).
Kinda makes one wonder, you know? Probably makes you wonder a little too. Makes you wonder how terrible my personality must be to drive these people to no longer speak to me when we didn’t even have a fight. It definitely makes me wonder. I’d like to think I’m a pretty pleasant person. I don’t like to complain about my own problems, which means I can spend my time being fun, or listening to everyone else’s lives. To be honest, I think my real life reflects my blog personality fairly closely. I like to talk. I like to tell stories. I like to listen to people’s problems. I like to give advice. Those are the things I do. Albeit, I used to be somewhat more interesting back in the day when my LIFE was more interesting, but that comes and goes.
Don’t feel bad for my life though. To be perfectly honest, my life is quite good. I won’t bore you with the details, but it really is good. What I don’t have? Friends. Someone to share my life with. People who care that my life is good or bad. People who get angry at the things that annoy you. People who know me. A reason to have a good life. A reason to be alive, really.
Someday I may lose T. It’s too much pressure on her to be the only one. She has her life, her boyfriend, her other friends (aka: my former friends), her obligations. Someday she’ll probably marry her bf. He’ll buy a house soon, they’ll get engaged. They’ve been house hunting. We’re drifting, and we’re both letting it happen. If I lose her, or, God-forbid she gets hit by a train, there won’t be a single person left in this world who knows me. Knows the real me. There will still be people left who will cry at my funeral (I mean, who wouldn’t cry at someone’s funeral who got hit by a train). But none of them would know the person they’d be crying for. I’d like to think that the group would show up for my funeral. It would be the right thing to do, you know. For appearances.
In many ways I measure my life by the positive effects I have on the people I care about. What’s the point of my life if there’s nobody left to care about? Don’t get me wrong, I love my family, but they don’t need me. They’d be sad if I was gone, but if I never existed, they’d probably be just fine.
And see, a few of you will read this. And you’ll probably say some nice things about me. Tell me you care. That my life matters. It’ll probably make me feel better for a few days. It’s nice. Don’t get me wrong, I care about all of you. But a hundred people reading and leaving nice comments on my blog won’t fill the void left by 5 people I love and who used to love me.
This blog exists because 5 of the 6 people I care most about in this world decided they no longer want anything to do with me.
- browse entries:
- older »
Connect
All Of My Weblogs
The "Creep Be Gone" Look (current): Some humor about rejecting suitors!
On Flirting and "Come Hither" Looks (337 views): Some observations on flirting
8 Stages To A Great Relationship (491 views): I refer to this constantly. A must read for relationships, but it's long... REALLY long...
Love Is (Part 1) (385 views): The first in a series of posts describing what Love REALLY is.
Celebrating Birthdays (243 views): Some observations about celebrating just for the sake of celebrating.
Long Distance and Online Relationships (327 views): Some insight and advice
Meeting New People (350 views): Some humor and observations starting at first sight/pickup lines
Tagging Entries (123 views): An FYI about tagging entries
Why Friends Hate SOs (218 views): Self Explanatory
He Doesn't Define You (2377 views): Just read it
On Living Together (528 views): Some thoughts about living together before marriage
Thank You to Douchebags (337 views): Some humor to all of 'those' guys
She Traded me DOWN? (536 views): About losing an ex to another person
Mad Now, Fight Later? (343 views): How to manage fights in a relationship
Someone to be with Forever (343 views): One of my personal favorite posts, a poem.
Dealing with Control Issues (68 views): Not my greatest work.
How To Be a Good Boyfriend for 2009 (343 views): Another one of my personal favorites
Secrets are like Sex (148 views): About sharing secrets and how it makes you closer.
Recommended
Pulse
-
I took a friend out to lunch yesterday. I called at 11AM and asked if they'd be busy at noon. He told me they'd have tables.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFMx-fn3s8o A very powerful clip about love from Boy Meets World. I may write a post about it
-
I asked a girl out for V-day today. Her response? I'm going to Canada. FAIL! So bad she had to flee the country...




Chatboard (19)